Sorry, I was unaware I had a separate history from straight people.

This is why I have a problem with GLBT month and Black History Month and all the other months dedicated to specific minority.

In high school, February 1st would roll around and suddenly every class would switch from the “normal” syllabus to the Black History Month syllabus. African American literature, African American history, etc. etc. etc. in every class. I always found this to be a little bit…racist. I always felt Women’s history month was little sexist too.

*insert gasp from the readers*

Yeah, I know. The whole point of these months is to combat racism and sexism right?

Unfortunately it’s just another form of “separate, but equal”. Sort of saying, let’s talk about all the accomplishments these people made, but point out the “handicap” they had to overcome to accomplish these things.

Sorry, I don’t think we especially need to point out that someone was a women, black (now gay, as California wants to point out in history class) to talk about their contributions to history.

Now, if the fact that they were female, black or gay is important to their historical contribution, (Joan of Arc, Queen Elizabeth I, Barack Obama*, Oscar Wilde, The Stonewall Riots) then you need to bring up the fact that they were female, black or gay because it’s important!  You don’t leave out important parts about a person’s background just because you don’t approve, but it’s equally unnecessary to point out “this person was gay” when it wasn’t important to their contributions, which is essentially what that law in California will end up doing.

See, I don’t have a separate history from the rest of the world. Gay people are human beings, just like everyone else. Isn’t that what this argument about gay equal rights is all about? We are all the same. I don’t want to have a separate section in the history books for “gay and lesbian contributions in history”. I don’t want a law that “would prohibit material that reflects adversely on gays.”

I want schools to teach history, real history, the way history happened. Without political and religious bias used to indoctrinate children into certain ways of thought. I want important historical contributions to be discussed throughout the school year, whether the contributions were made by men, women, blacks, whites, gay, straight, protestant, Catholic, Buddhist or Hindu. Is that so much to ask?

Apparently it is.

 

*Being black…and a socialist… is his only historical contribution…

About meredithancret

My name is Meredith and I’m a social media addict. I’m a political science major who basically eats, sleeps, and breathes politics…when I’m not watching NCIS, reading fantasy novels, or baking. Liberals seem to hate me for my very existence, it might have something to do with my being a conservative who is both female and gay…

Posted on 07/06/2011, in democrats, GLBT, politics, religion, republicans and tagged , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. 7 Comments.

  1. I very much enjoyed reading this. Thanks!

  2. Betty Collins

    I find the “history of” months banal as well. And you are right– glbtq people do have the same history as straight people. But one thing about history is that it is deeply subjective. 101 level history courses give the grand narrative that applies to eras writ large and wide swaths of people. No matter who we are, we are defined by the times in which we live.

    THat said, as one studies more, the eras become more specific and the subjects become more subjective. Black people, women, and gay people have different experiences in different historical eras. It’s pretty fascinating to learn about how laws, policing practices, and even medical views have changed over time. Likewise– the ways that gay people cope, adjust, hide, come out, adapt, deal, conform and protest also changes over time. Gay people react to and shape the eras in which they live.

    So celebrate this one month a year? Yeah, that’s lame. History should represent the complexity of of past reality. That means the ways that gay people are the same and the ways their lives differ; the changes they experience in a lifetime and the continuities that persist from generation to generation.

    • Of course, I agree that there should be classes taught on those subjects. However, in high school when students are learning a general overview of history, it’s not necessary. In college having classes like that is understandable, or having extra classes in high school available for those interested in furthering their history studies.

      In my experience, history classes rarely have time to cover what NEEDS to be covered in basic history…adding extra requirements for things that aren’t necessary isn’t going to help education standards.

  1. Pingback: Affirmative Action Bullshit and You CAN actually still write objectively while holding personal opinions on a topic « The Snark Who Hunts Back

  2. Pingback: California, Land of the Crazies, and why the Luthor plan may be the only way to save the state. | The Conservative New Ager

  3. Pingback: Prop 8 Decision and why it hurts gay rights | The Conservative New Ager

  4. Pingback: The Prop 8 Decision and Why It Hurts Gay Rights | The Conservative New Ager

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 3,444 other followers

%d bloggers like this: